Clinician-trialist rounds: 3. Priority setting for academic success
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Clinician-trialist rounds: 9. Mentoring - part 3: the structure and function of effective mentoring: advice and protection.
متن کامل
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
BACKGROUND The sustainability of healthcare systems worldwide is threatened by a growing demand for services and expensive innovative technologies. Decision makers struggle in this environment to set priorities appropriately, particularly because they lack consensus about which values should guide their decisions. One way to approach this problem is to determine what all relevant stakeholders u...
متن کاملOn the determinants of academic success as a clinician-scientist.
I believe that the determinants of academic success as a clinician-scientist (defined in terms of principal investigatorship, lead authorship, promotion, tenure, career awards, honours, power and reputation) are not “academic” (defined in terms of intelligence, theoretical understanding, mastery of a body of knowledge and teaching skills). Although some academics fail because they are crazy and...
متن کاملNational Institute of Academic Anaesthesia research priority setting exercise.
BACKGROUND Formal research priority setting is a recognized way of identifying important clinical research questions and promoting these as topics for commissioned research. This paper describes a research priority setting exercise conducted by the National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA). METHODS Possible research questions were identified from a questionnaire sent to holders of the...
متن کاملStakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist
Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their priority setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all people with well-justified, reasonable reasons to endorse the decisions. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Clinical Trials
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1740-7745,1740-7753
DOI: 10.1177/1740774510396934